No apologies needed DaSpecial I was just wondering if EA had buffed up the reqs so that it would be more of a pain to run

Thank you roerzman for confirming that because I think that me and EA would have a problem if that was the case, but on a lighter note I thought I would give the ones of you who plan on getting the game a little hope. I did some digging around and found that this leaked version is indeed a beta version and to boot is the DD (digital download) like I had originally thought thus the reason for the DRM secuROM so before I get hit with rocks here is my proof to back up my theory
first this is from snootysims from a user called anonymouse
Eureka! I am now 99% certain the leak is only a BETA!
EVIDENCE:
1. Empirical evidence. There are far too many obvious and strange bugs, that just don't make sense. The installation of the game doesn't even have any decent pictures, vids, information, sound, music, anything, no packaging at all.
2. It is unlikely that the gold master DVD's and printing press would not be under watch. It is far more likely that this DVD fell off the wagon to a Sims fan event.
3. The file structure is whacky. There are many things missing. There is no finalized and presentable structure to the core game.
4. There are third party developer software files that shouldn't be there, like graphics, audio and code compiler logs and dependency files.
5. Some of the files are timestamped several months back.
6. File sizes make no sense. Package and cache sizes are too large, obviously meant to run on powerful developers computers (like mine <g>).
7. It has SecuROM. And the wrong version to boot!
8. Several announced fan event features are not present.
9. Graphics have since changed, or do not appear to be working right. For instance smoothing/antialiasing and filtering are not working as intended.
10. The version, while labelled 1.0 in some description and help files which is probably what most people have opened, is in redundant files that should have been removed called Content.Devtest.1397 Changelist:622971.
When games are created many different version are compiled tested. This game appears to have been compiled for the SOLE reason of testing content, that is, the textures, objects, sims etc. everything that goes into the game, and as such, it has to be one of the most stable and available tested builds... in other words it's not strange that people think it's the full game. There are just so many bizarre things and obvious bugs and missing features in it, that have long made me suspicious.
I found this in three seperate descriptors and logs.
description=Version: 0.DL-0.0.11190 Changelist: 624575
Version:1.TCC.dl.1209
Version:1.Content.Devtest.1397
Changelist:622971
TCC is a third party compiler. It shouldn't be there. No coder with any self respect would label a game devtest 1397. Nor would he put a changelist on it unless they needed one to refer to in order to see what was a bug and what wasn't.
CompositorCacheSize = 104857600
SimCompositorCacheSize = 524288000
WorldCompositorCacheSize = 524288000
SimWorldCompositorCacheSize = 524288000
This is just wrong. Why are the caches so large? Why are the packages so large? Why are they encrypted in a non-standard format no modders recognize? It doesn't make sense... unless they're developer versions encrypted/coded in a format that they use for their software.
And if there is not supposed to be custom content, why do we have this?
EnableCustomContent = true
ExportsFolderName = Exports
ImportsFolderName = Downloads
BackupFolderName = DCBackup
PackageThumbnails = false
PackageThumbnailsInSims3Pac = true
DeleteTempExportFolder = true
RemapCollisionsOnly = true
Ladies and gentlemen, hope lives... we may see an even BETTER final version of this game, hopefully void of the problems and bugs, and a vibrant modder community to BOOST!
and this from a user over at MATY
The reloaded iso is the digital download version, as can be seen in the EULA that everybody clicks past without reading:
"ELECTRONIC ARTS
END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
FOR THE SIMS 3 GAME
(DISTRIBUTED BY DIGITAL DOWNLOAD)"
also
"B. Technical Protection Measures. When you purchase the Software online via digital download (the “Digital Download Version”), you receive a Digital Download Version of the Software that uses SecuROM digital rights management technology provided by Sony DADC Austria AG. The SecuROM technology is integrated into the Digital Download Version of the Software and is not a separate installation. For more information about SecuROM, visit
www.securom.com and http:/faq.securom.com/. By installing the Software, you acknowledge and agree to the Software’s use of SecuROM. An internet connection is required to authenticate the Software and verify your license (“Online Authentication”)."
So that would explain the phoning home, no idea why it's on an iso though.
So I just thought I would post that little tid-bit of information for any of you hopefuls such as myself and also I forgot to mention that someone said over at MATY who downloaded the leaked version said the exe. files were dated as far back as April so that is another good possibility that this copy is indeed a beta